Body Ink - Artistic Expression or Permanent Accessory?

Often times we pass individuals on the street with various representations of themselves scrolled across their bodies. Some tattoos appear to have personal/ emotional indications, but others could very well be the result of silly adolescence or a night of intoxication. Either way, there is a market for permanent body ink. The question is, how do these lasting expressions affect the ever changing realm of style?

Persons with tattoos often defend their body ink as a form of artistic expression. Yet, can this form of expression take away from another? In fashion, there are a few style choices that could possibly be enhanced by tattoos; for example, Glam Rock or Punk. Familiar public figures that often exhibit this look are Rihanna and Adam Lambert. But when the style changes, is it possible for the body art to adjust to the new look?

Angelina Jolie, an actress famous for her tattoos, is pictured above in a long elegant black gown with the updo to match. Though, when she turns around, her tattoos are made visible and somewhat downplay the look of the woman facing forward. The picture almost depicts a mullet sort of effect. Ms. Jolie seems to be business in the front, but all party in the back.

Of course, tattoos are a personal choice and definitely a lot easier to pull-off in Hollywood than corporate America, but when contemplating which picture should be imprinted on an ankle, back or forearm, how long will it be before the look just does not fit? After all, one scarf may be great under a blazer, but may not suit that polka-dotted cardigan as well.

(Pictures provided by 2tattoodesigns.com and trendhunter.com)