Long Live McQueen!



 I know that it may seem incredibly predictable, but what kind of fashion blogger would I be if I did not cover the Royal Wedding. Wouldn't you expect me to regale you with stories of love and romance, of princes and princesses, of Kate Middleton's Cinderella like tale? If that is the case, you'd better stop reading now.

Don't get me wrong, I respect and adore the tradition that is the Royal Family, but most importantly I respect the display of fashion that came from this event. The wedding was a impromptu runway affair, and I, the adoring aficiando. Of course, the highlight being the gorgeous lace bodiced Alexander McQueen gown chosen by the now Duchess of Cambridge (dseigned by Sarah Burton of the House of McQueen). I must say that in a Victorian dress echoing Grace Kelly, Kate Middleton was, to put it plainly, stunning.



Unfortunately, some often fashion forward guests seemed a bit unsure of appropriate royal wedding attire. The fabulous Victoria Beckham underwhelmed in her own design. After three children she should have maternity chic down packed. Why, therefore, did she insist on this shadow casting navy frock? Fortunately, in any good marriage there needs to be balance, and David Beckham took the reigns from his wife in royal appropriate Ralph Lauren.


 Lastly, English socialite, Tara Palmer Tomkinson, made a fervent attempt to literally outshine the bride by nabbing every electric blue item in the UK. Sadly, her attempt to channel the Duke Blue Devil within left onlookers a bit overcome by the cobalt queen.

Hopefully, these missteps will not cost these ladies invites to future royal affairs. In the meantime, I must offer the decree: "off with their threads".


(Pictures provided by dailymail.co.uk and people.com)

Why Fashion Maintains the Zero Frame!

When a trend plagues "the Media" and eventually the rest of the country, a small but steadfast group tries to locate the source. In the case of the size zero or less trend, who would we find at the birthplace?

In my research, I've found several fingers pointing toward straight men, gay men, and women as a cause for blame. People insist that straight men desire this figure, gay male designers prefer the clothes hanger look, and women place unattainable feats on their fellow females as a means of competition. All of these answers are somewhat credible, but I would have to say they are ALL WRONG!

Before I get to who I think is to blame, let's analyze this trend. I would have to say that the size zero stipulation is the most mundane thing to happen to the fashion industry. It has turned all of our models into cardboard cutouts rather than fabulous fashion figures.

Let's go back in time for a second and rediscover the fashion model. Twenty years ago, we hailed models who are still world renowned: Tyra Banks, Kate Moss, Heidi Klum, Brooke Shields, Naomi Campbell...and the list goes on and on. Today, very few people can name a model that has such an influence as the women I've just recalled. Now, these women are in their thirties and forties with no prospects on the horizon to take their places.

After much deliberation, I have determined that Hollywood is to blame. Sure we've had lovely movie stars in the past, but actresses have penetrated the fashion industry and used the zero size to boot out the models.

Once, being a model meant gracing the covers of top fashion magazines and becoming the face of popular design houses. Models we considered otherworldly because you couldn't just find a gorgeous, thin, 5'11 woman around every corner. So, in order to redefine beauty and infiltrate the industry that promotes it, actresses had to get rid of the beautiful beanstalks. Not everyone can grow to 5'11 or have unparalleled looks, but they can lose weight; Tori Spelling, Lindsay Lohan and many more have shown us how.

Now, the 5'3 Natalie Portman is on the cover of Vogue and the face of Christian Dior. Unfortunately, that means that the women on screen become more familar to the masses, and the models, once fashion's top representatives, just fade into the background.

Trends You LOVE to HATE!



newsfeed.time.com



Has anyone else noticed that men's clothing has been shrinking over the years? We've had skinny ties, tight fitting shirts and most recently the GIRLFRIEND JEAN??!?!?!. Since the plunge into the millennium, men's attire has developed a serious case of anorexia and I believe it's about time for an intervention. 

I must admit that I was never a fan of the oversized look, but this is a bit extreme. Skinny ties are fetching and on the right body a tight fitting shirt could do wonders. Yet, when one cannot walk the city streets without being visually assaulted by someone's family jewels, I cannot keep silent.

True, the summers of 2009 and 2010 brought us the boyfriend jean that could flatter just about any female figure with the right pump. But gentlemen, this was not meant as a personal challenge. Anything we can do, you can not necessarily do better.

Although the popular jeans brand, Levi's, is spearheading this SUCK-tioned trend, I can only hope that this one, like most, will soon see it's end.  Until then, I can somewhat rejoice in the prediction that teen pregnancy will take a downward turn due to what I like to call T.I.M. (trend influenced impotency).

Feel strongly about this trend or any other's that force you the shield your eyes? Leave comments below! I look forward to hearing from you. Ciao for now!